Monday, March 7, 2011

Second Amendment Truth

“The Congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate or interfere with domestic concerns of any state, it belongs to them to establish any rule respecting the rights of property, nor will the Constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people, or peaceful assemblies by them for whatever purposes, and in any number they may see the occasion”.

And of course we know during our lifetimes the Congress is not adhering to this rule of the Constitution, The 14th Amendment snake in the grass has created their illusion of power. As if this rule above were not enough, the framers listed below their deepest convictions on the subject of arms, people, and law by adding their voices to the archives of history to support the right of the people to bear arms at any place and in any manner without constraint. (See the Origin of the Second Amendment; A Documentary history of the Bill of Rights 1787-1792-David E. Young-1991)

Samuel Evans;

” The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States of America from keeping and bearing arms.”

Zacharia Johnson;

” The people are not to be deprived of their weapons. They are to be left in full possession of them…”

Fisher Ames;

” The rights of conscience, of bearing arms, of changing governments are declared to be inherent in the people.”

Thomas Cooley hits on this second amendment well, he was a giant of a man when it came to the Constitution. He wrote a great book known as “The General Principles of Constitutional Law in America, I happen to own a copy myself, his work was released in 1880. Mr. Cooley makes it very clear that the right to keep and bear arms is a right above the reach of all government, local, county, state, and federal, and that right cannot be infringed upon under any color of or pretext whatsoever. And furthermore I say myself including a foreign power allowed into our nation to subvert our heritage under the guise of environment repair.

Judge Cooley made the Second Amendment a matter of very serious and grave concern and he warned that no government agency at whatever level can pass ex post facto laws or bills of attainder, in fact all communist gun control ” laws “ fall under these prohibitions. In fact not one code of law is valid in this nation, they are over powered by our founding documents, and the test of proper Constitutional instruction and research bares this truth out in full.

The damaging fraudulent pretexts of many villains in our American history do not hold water, The worst of them was Thomas J. Dodd D-CT who used our tax dollars against us when he had the Library of Congress translate the 30 year old Nazi German ” gun control act” law into English. Only four months after this request Congress passed the Gun Control Act of 1968- GCA-1968, Dodd being the principle author and sponsor, and this act is identical to Hitlers gun control of Germany in the 1930s..

Many other villains against liberty have attacked the Second Amendment prior to Dodd’s time and post Dodd era, like Lautenberg, Schumer, Feinstein, Boxer, Lieberman, Brady, Kennedy, Even McCain, Ginsburg, and Obama..OBAMA HAS A VOTING RECORD in Illinois which proves his stance on the second, and he is attempting to damage the right to reload our own ammunition right now, and this man is just waiting the opportunity to start banning all types of guns….All and more have attempted to restrict the rights of law abiding citizens to keep and bear arms, but my friends those lies fall flat in the face of Storeys pronouncement;

” The Second Amendment like most other provisions of the Constitution has a history. It was adopted with some modifications from the English Bill of Rights of 1688 where it stood as a protest against arbitrary action of the overturned dynasty in disarming the people, a pledge of the new ruler that this tyrannical action should cease. The right is GENERAL (that is not subject to restrictions-me) and the meaning of the provision undoubtedly is, that the people from whom the militia must be taken, shall have the right to keep and bear arms, and they need no permission or regulation of law for that purpose.”

The Dick Act is a prohibition upon government making laws that attempt to abridge the right to keep and bear arms and to carry them everywhere.

John Marshall, the third Chief Justice of the Supreme Court ruled that a power sought (in this instance gun control) has to be in the Constitution already, or it has to be expressly implied or in pursuance of a power already stated in the Constitution, or the power cannot be taken and the bill falls to the ground. This ruling alone, makes all gun control laws anywhere in the United States of America null and void, as there is no reference anywhere in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights that would allow government at any level, local, county, state, or federal to abridge the rights of the people to bear arms at all times, or to bear arms anywhere. (Excepting in the case of unjustified violence to innocents of or by a mad man which our common laws covered as harm had been done to one man by another and justice then could be served via jury).

There is no such thing as “federal gun law”. This fact comes through loud and clear if a detailed in-depth study of the Annals of Congress, Congressional Globes, and Congressional Records is undertaken. The Congressional Record, House 28, 1904 pages 3898–3906, quoting Judge Cooley’s Constitutional Limitations;

” In the American system the power to establish the ordinary regulations of the police has been left with the states and cannot be taken away from them, neither wholly or in part, and exercised under legislation. Neither can the national government or any of its departments or officers assume any supervision of the police regulations of the states.”

” This power to make municipal (state) regulations for the restraint and punishment of crime, for the health and preservation of health and morals of her citizens has never been surrendered by the states nor restrained by the Constitution.”

This landmark case is a formidable restraint upon the Federal Government and tells it that it cannot pass laws or attempt to enforce laws in the states effecting the Tenth Amendment, and it is expressly implied that the Federal Government and its officers cannot interfere with the Second Amendment right of citizens to keep and bear arms at any place and at any time. The Federal Government and its agents are in violation of the Supreme law of this nation, our Constitution, our Bill of Rights, which should be a separate Document from the Federal Constitution, and they are in violation of the Declaration of Independence.

Not only do they misconstrue the Second Amendment, they ignore all the powers delegated to the federal government which are found in article 1, section 8, Clauses 1–8, and as for the matters of gun control in any way shape or form and under any disguise whatever are not in these delegated powers, the Second Amendment cannot be overridden by the president, the house and the senate, not now, not at anytime. They can only continue to break the law and violate their oaths of office.

Senator Sam Ervin, cited in the Congressional Record, Senate, pages 3297-3304;

” I would paraphrase that remark I made before by saying that when laws like these are passed by members of the Congress, they are grossly subservient to pressure groups which demand passage of such laws as the price of their support for these members of Congress.”

As you can see the sell out and misspending of tax funds is severe in Washington D.C. by this comment Mr. Ervin made. Of course we all know it in our hearts, this betrayal knows no depth, no bounds..It is treason, and the foul fruits of this deception are yet to be suffered onto the American people..

Now American gun owners have suffered many court trials as of late, The Heller being the most recent Supreme Court Case, which has damaged the Second Amendment,(Read it for yourselves it is plain to see in the wording of that decision.) And then we have the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Nordyke v. King) attempting to call this Second Amendment a collective privilege under the ” protection” of the 14th red amendment, you should be realizing this is all a fraud, a dog and pony show to deceive Americans even more.. I say no, I am not tricked by this treachery.

Nor can judges read their predilections into the Constitution, as was attempted by Justice McReynolds. the Ninth Amendment was written to prevent this type of conduct by judges. Another amendment being suffocated by the red 14th amendment..never ratified mind you, I challenge any and all legal minds to produce the original ratification documents of July, 28, 1868, and see that three fourths of the states in fact did not correctly ratify this red 14th Amendment..Just as the 16th and 17th Amendments fail the test of proper ratification themselves, and this writer has those very documents in evidence as proof…

In a Court of law and integrity the truth then allowed to be shown in it’s entirety would prove the 14th Amendment for what it is, and unratified fraud..And that fraud cannot protect my rights or yours reader, and it never has, prior to this fraud 14th amendment Americans Citizens were living under the protections of their Sovereign States, as sovereign national de-jure citizens, Free men. The 14th Amendment changed this, it made all persons born in the United States (excluding the Indian nations) citizens of the united states first and citizens of a state secondly. This reversed the original American citizenship. Freedom was stolen with this coup d’ etat in the very first sentence of the 1868 14th Amendment…

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. “

Of course the 14th goes on to portray federal protections of citizens rights from the states doing citizens unjust legal harm, this is a lie because the states Constitutions mirrored the federal Constitution prior to 1792 when the states insisted the federal Constitution and those famous 10 Amendments be added to the federal document, to protect states Sovereignty and citizens Sovereignty from the federal government…protection usurped by the 1868 – 14th Amendment..

We continually see the federal government abuse Americans rights across this nation, ignoring the 10th amendment and running roughshod over citizens in the states with tyrannical insanity,( See the wolf re-introduction program, and notice states citizens did not vote on that subject) someone please explain to me how the 14th incorporating the 2nd Amendment is going to protect us gun owners…The fact is it will not do so.. We do not have NATURAL RIGHTS under the 14th Amendment ! CIVIL RIGHTS are granted to us as PRIVILEGE ! Privilege’s can be taken away…Private property can be stolen at will by the feds under the powers granted THEM by the 1868 - 14th Amendment for a federal dictator.

Guns in fact are private property and as such, guns were specifically excluded from the Interstate Commerce measure by the Founding Fathers.

Third Chief Justice John Marshall wrote ;

“When the U.S. Constitution is silent on any proposed power under the delegated powers of Congress ( Article 1, Section 8, C1. 1-18) and the proposed power is incidental to another power already in the Constitution, then it is a prohibition (inhibition) of that power and it may not be taken or used.”

This ruins all gun control lies, laws, deceptions, of any credibility, makes them, no forces them to be null and void, ultra-vires and not anything more than wasted paper and ink period.

As well the fifth Amendment to the Bill of Rights, article 5, comes into the prohibition of gun control laws;

“……nor be deprived of life and PROPERTY, ” and as we have already stated, guns are PRIVATE PROPERTY…. Read it and flinch you communists !!!

Professor Joyce J. Malcolm ;

” The Second Amendment was meant to accomplish two distinct goals, each perceived crucial as to the maintenance of liberty. First, it was meant to guarantee an individual’s right to have arms for self defense and self preservation. Such an individual right was a legacy of the English Bill of Rights ( broadened in scope in America from the English antecedent.) The second clause concerning the militia was not amended to limit ownership of arms to the militia…but rather to express the preference for a militia over a standing army.” From her book- To Keep and Bear Arms.

Standing military under the government control has nothing to do with the Second Amendment, In fact the founders warned against a standing army, the militia is YOU, and ME…Only we can defend liberty, or give it up..

The American Revolutionary Battle for Liberty and Justice was no war, and it is still ongoing today, it never ended…Unsuppressed History proves my case…Remember, Kings, Tyrants, Oligarch’s, Priests, Princes and thieves all lie and suppress truth to fit their own ends, not ours…not humanity’s..

This Federal government has shown it can not manage our money, our lands, our borders, our wild animals, how then can it manage my personal security ? The fact is it cannot and never intends to do so…The theft of a nation by foreign interests continues under the auspices of 1868 – 14th Amendment “Liberty “…..

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is a Natural Right which means it is a personal right to defend oneself, the oldest right known to mankind, traced as far back historically as 872 A.D. As to the Roman Civil Judiciary which via a convenient European fomented Civil War and presidential assassination this legal take over by those foreign scoundrels has taken illegal residence in this nation since 1868, July 28th to be exact..They continue to try to put their own interpretations into it by twisting and violating the 9th Amendment, and most members of Congress, with some notable exceptions do not know the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, and they fail miserably when it comes to our States individual Constitutions as well..

Other than to recite the articles and clauses when necessary to put on their big show these Lawyers fail the test of Constitutional savvy. I think and many Constitutionalists believe our nations leaders who are supposed to be our nations guardians should be required five years minimum of Constitutional schooling, The populace should have been required to be schooled in this legal information as well, since after all it is a contract to maintain their own Liberty, but unfortunately in the last 100 years it is safe to say the majority of these law students received one semester of Constitutional instruction at best and for that matter our Universities do not teach the proper definitions of the Document themselves. It is a sad state of affairs and it shows..And the people this famous document defends are ignorant to it’s meaning, and take for granted strangers will guard it for them, these people are in for a huge let down soon..

The late Senator Ervin was the only one who could confirm our list of personal rights, which are the rights government can never take from us through any Congressional or Court actions, period..Now days our populace waits around for these bumbling bunch of fools and their Court’s to decide the definitions of Rights, which were decided and defined many decades ago, and we only need to read them ourselves to learn the truth..

Mankind is in error when they decide to trust strangers to decipher Scripture and law for them, instead of staying abreast of those documents themselves, this was not the case in the days of the 1800s, people had time to read then, and stay sharp in these lessons of Liberty, law, and natural Rights from God..

Today we have trained intellectuals who think their superior in intelligence compared to those people of history, Great books and works of ancient letters of the 1700s-1800s, and even early 1900s do not bare this out to be true.. How then do the most educated of our two centuries lose their own nation and stare in bewilderment and confusion as to the cause… History may even show scholars in the future that these people in latter day America surrendered their guns to a small group of liars and con men via fear..

It seems highly unlikely to me that these brave modern day intellectuals of the 1940′s to present have been aware of the Dick Act of 1902. Perhaps even as early as 1934 when we had an attack on the Second Amendment as well. Regardless of that communist relic and attempt to disarm Americans in direct violation of the Dick Act then and today because this Act still stands tall, right beside the Second Amendment.

Not only is Government and Congress along with the Courts in violation of the Dick Act, as well they violate The 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and Article 1, Section 9, Part 3 of the U.S. Constitution itself..

The federal government is one of delegated powers and not original powers, and the primary powers of congress are found in Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 1-18. Interfering with personal rights, among them the right to keep and bear arms is not found in the sole or delegated powers of the federal government, and incidentally, nor in the Constitution of the several states, local, county, and any other legislative bodies are bound by these restraints.

The secondary powers of the Senate are meant to be housekeeping powers and nowhere in the Constitution is the Congress authorized to tamper with our personal unalienable rights as Sovereign De-Jure Nationals which their in servitude to, and neither are they to tamper with the Second Amendment Right to keep and bare arms..nor the right to be well supplied in that endeavor.

Of course these Congressmen and Senators think we are weak minded out here in the nation and are unaware of those fraudulent contracts they have helped the banking institutions trick us into them the upper hand over us and our rights, by natural rights nullification upon signature..I beg to differ because any educated citizen knows those contracts are based on fraud..

And contracts based on fraud fail in the court of justice as well as their attempts to re-define our first 10 Amendments fail in that court of justice as well..we just need a few brave good men to stand and insist those courts listen and stop accepting the bribe..After all once Liberty falls, where will these rich Judges spend their wealth ? These men in black robes will learn about treachery themselves one fine day…They have been used.

Those first 10 Amendments are not privileges, They are Rights, and the Second Amendment Right is there to safeguard them all. Against Courts, Congressmen, Senators, gone bad..This second Amendment is not addressed to States, it is Addressed to We the People ( Capitals intended) , the sovereigns residing in the sovereign states;

“The Right of the PEOPLE…” The same language is used in the 4th Amendment. In fact the entire Bill of Rights is addressed to the people.. People means Citizen and citizen means people, That is you and me reader, citizens of the States, not the federal government and the 10th Amendment makes the distinction between the people and the federal government very clearly;

” The powers not delegated to the United States (singular) by the Constitution are reserved to the States (Plural) respectively or to the People.”

One of the less famous Founders of this effort towards Freedom, Liberty, and unalienable Rights was George Tucker, veteran of the battle for independence ( I say battle because the war for Independence did not end, and is far from over). George was a professor of law at William and Mary, a judge of the Virginia Court, and a champion of the entrenched Second Amendment Rights of the People to keep and bear arms, Mr. Tucker makes the issue crystal clear in his work, ” Blackstone’s Commentaries”;

” This may be considered the palladium of liberty—The right ( and again, note it is a right and not a privilege) of self defense is the first law of nature; in most governments it has been the study of the rulers to keep this right within its narrowest limits possible…A well regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be abridged. ” In those days well regulated meant well supplied. See the 1828 Websters Dictionary for clarification of that fact…

Did you notice this says, first the ” right of the PEOPLE ” and does not restrict that right to the militia only, and in any case, the militia is the whole PEOPLE..An attack on the Second Amendment is an attack on the whole Constitution. Clauses and amendments cannot be isolated like these communist gun grabbers time and again keep attempting to do, Villains have tried this to many times, and every single time We the people have stood up and clarified these true and factual definitions historically, We the people had better sit up and take note, their at it again, with Heller, and several other brazen attempts, like the recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and this travesty of definitions portrayed in that false endeavor to protect a “Civil” Right under the false protections of the Roman Red 14th Amendment..Nordyke v. King.. To buy into these findings of this case is to be in error !

The master owns Civil 14th amendment rights not We the people, those are 14th amendment privileges and I say to the master begone with them, I’ll keep my natural rights and I’ll remain my own master.. Knowledge is power and the oligarch hates and educated man..In 1809 the great John Randolph said ;

” The PEOPLE (not the states, not the local government not the federal government) who will consent to remain unarmed while arms are put in the hands of a standing army governed by martial law are ripe for a master.”

Randolph makes it crystal clear that our right, the PEOPLES right is vested in We the PEOPLE and we are responsible to keep this right, not courts, not Congress, not foolish University Trained by the master holding his license A-Turn-ee’s who would sell us out either deliberately or by error. What we have today, are courts, local boards, local and county governments and their officers who are attempting to insert clauses of their own making between the 1st and 9th Amendments, and this is very much the case with gun-grabbers who try to twist and squeeze the Constitution to fit their predilections, forbidden mind you by the 9th Amendment.

The unratified unconstitutional, null and void, red 14th amendment attempted to rob the states of property rights and other States rights, but the 14th (even if it was a part of the Constitution, which it isn’t) did not try to abridge the right of citizens to keep and bear arms, nor does it say that guns come under interstate commerce.

The great John Marshall, our third Chief Justice of the Supreme Court must be turning in his grave at the antics of local boards, counties, States, and federal government attempts to abridge the Right of We the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, and of the attempts of the Red Americans using their red 14th amendment to nullify the original 10 Amendments of our authority over them ! Our public servants have turned on us ! As well they are using the treatise known as the U.N Charter and the environmental holocaust against freedom included with their illegal ESA contracts, all subtle subversions via the unratified 17th amendment, oh these red Europeans and their red American friends are very clever indeed..They fooled most of us but not all of us !

It is time we stood up and told them we have had enough. We must tell them of their errors. Nor can they continue with these illegal restrictions whatever imposed on We the People any longer, as well the types of arms and munitions is ours to decide and to keep and bear. Please Mr. Red American would you point out in the Constitution those restraints as to the numbers and types of guns We People may possess are written, or expressly implied ? That would be quite and achievement, as it simply is not there !

The right to keep and bear arms vested in We, the People, goes back many centuries and existed in the thirteen colonies long before they came together as the United States of America, and it is very important to be aware of the fact that when the thirteen colonies came into this Union they retained their original states rights, and the personal rights which England attempted to abolish with the battle for liberty known as the American Revolution, one of which was the existing right prior to our Bill of Rights finalized in 1792, which was the right to keep and bear arms. This in itself creates a precedent of that right and out weighs legislation which came later..Paper and ink do not give men rights, God gave men rights and men must keep them, or lose them..Historically men always end up fighting to keep them with physical combat..

This debate over our rights and the establishment of the Bill of Rights was waged in Congress and the public for five long years before men finally grudgingly for many settled on the famous 10 amendments, protected by the second amendment. And ever since that day in the history of American politics certain political groups of European descent have been attempting to abolish those rights..just as their own ancestors did.

“….The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the PEOPLE of the United States who are peaceable CITIZENS from keeping their arms.” Note that the legal definition “people” and “citizen” are interchangeable and mean the same thing. Other Founding Fathers who were no less aware of the European threat and staunchly fought to protect the Liberty of the people also included the following :

Patrick Henry said :

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every man who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined. The great object is that every man be armed, everyone who is able may have a gun.”

As you can see the singular, “MAN” is conclusive proof that it is an individual, personal right.

John Adams ;

“Arms in the hands of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion…in private self defense.”

If and U.S. soldier or Foreign U.N soldier attempts to murder you, then you must defend your own private self from this attack…or perish.

Thomas Jefferson :

“No free man shall ever be debarred from the use of arms—The Constitution of most of our states (and of our United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people, that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed…”

Why then reader do scoundrels attack this second amendment throughout history including and especially recent history, we can see that the Founding Fathers clearly clarified their intent and purpose not only of the Second Amendment but of the 1st through the 10th Amendment’s as well..Lets continue, as when it comes to proving my case I am ruthless and unforgiving, the time for forgiveness is past..We read…

George Mason;

” I ask you, sir, what is the Militia ? It is the whole people except for a few public officials. To disarm the people, that is the best and most effective way to enslave them.”

Zacharia Johnson;

” The people are not to be deprived of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.”

Tenche Cox;

“….The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of the hands of either federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, the hands of the people.”

Alexander Hamilton;

” The best we can hope for concerning the people is that they are properly armed.”

Fisher Ames;

” The rights of conscience, of bearing arms, of changing governments are declared to be inherent in the people.”

These men and many others were at the creation of this new government, our federal Constitution, our Bill of Rights, as well they were fully aware of the preceding states Constitutions, and their definitions of the Second Amendment rings loud and clear, new era definitions are nothing but attacks against the entire Bill of Rights, nothing more..I do not need further interpretation as to their intent..

” The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, therefore, is a right of the individual citizen to privately possess and carry in a peaceful manner firearms and similar arms. Such an individual rights interpretation is in full accord with the history of the right to keep and bear arms previously discussed…It accurately reflects the majority of proposals that lead up to the Bill of Rights itself.” —1982 subcommittee on the Constitution of the United States Senate Judiciary Committee Report..” The Right To Keep And Bear Arms”…I believe it is mandatory reading for every person/citizen every gun owner, every government official, federal state or local, every anti gun idiot.

It is very clear that freemen, persons, citizens, have the absolute right to keep and bear arms, form a militia and for the militia to keep and bear arms also, the unorganized (unenrolled) militia being the largest; pages 1391 – 1396; appendix, Annals of Congress May 7, 1792 and the Dick Act of 1902. The very language of the Dick Act speaks of the “Right of the PEOPLE” and the 1st and 4th Amendments likewise, use the language ” THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE.” Capitals intended..

It is apparent by all the foolish court cases brought forth over the last century, those attorneys incorrect statements bringing incorrect rulings has inflicted some harm as those are being acted on by officials, (Warren Burger Case – Socialists like Civilleti and Katzenbach – The 1968 Hitlerian gun control act – The 1993 so-called crime bill – the more recent debates of right to carry at work, leave it in your trunk on corporate property – Heller, and this 9th circuit fiasco in California) obviously none of those buffoons have read the Dick Act of 1902 much less heard of it..Let alone studied Burger, Civilleti and Katzenbach and how those idiots chose to deliberately violate the Dick Act. Whether out of ignorance or by design, these individuals should have been impeached and tried for treason for violating their oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution..And politely hanged.

Furthermore the so-called unconstitutional gun control “laws” the one in the 1930s, the one in 1968, and the 1993 Clintonista treasonous disaster known as the “crime bill” and the thousands of impertinent state “laws” and local ordinances implementing “gun control” are all null and void and in violation of the Second Amendment – The Dick Act of 1902 – And Article 1, Section 9, part 3, of the U.S. Constitution…enough is just enough people !!

” No bill of attainder or expost facto laws shall be passed.” PERIOD ! And remember, no legislatures can purport to pass ordinances or laws that violate the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. All such legislative acts have got to conform with the SUPREME LAW of the land…illegal code enforcement regardless…

The Dick Act passed by Congress on June 30, 1902, was written by Representative (General) Dick, and it is a very lengthy document from which I can only quote extracts from for this blog..Known as the “Efficiency of the Militia Act H.R. 11654,” The Dick Act makes all so-called “gun control” laws, the 1968 version-The Brady bill, Feinstien’s assault weapons” bill – the various Schumer bills, and the Lautenberg bill, null and void and of no force or effect, incumbent upon none. The Second Amendment combined with the Dick Act of 1902 makes all B.A.T.F. regulations pertaining to guns without legal substance, archaic, unconstitutional and incumbent on none..

Time to stand up Americans and take back that which has been stolen from you!!!

The Dick Act is the finest bit of legislation protecting the 2nd Amendment Rights of the citizens passed in the last century (1902) H.R. 11654 is one of the twin peaks upon which the Communist ” Gun Control” founders founder and fail to climb..The Dick Act confirms the existence of three types of militia; the regular army; the Organized Militia; known as the national guard–and the unorganized militia. It is found in the Congressional Record, House pages 7706-7713, 321-352, 7594-7595, “Efficiency of the Militia” Bill H.R. 11654..

” Be it enacted that the militia shall consist of every able bodied male citizen, respective of the States, Territories, and the District of Colombia and every able-bodied male of foreign birth who has declared his intention to become a citizen, who is more than 18 and less than 45 years of age, shall be divided into three classes; organized militia, to be known as the national Guard of the State, Territory or District of Columbia, or by such other designations by the laws of the respective States or Territories, as may be given by the laws of the respective States or Territories, the national voluntary reserve as provided in this act, and the remainder to be known as the reserve militia.” Then to answer a question Rep Dick stated as follows ;

” If the gentleman refers to the unenrolled militia as it is now termed, there would be 10,000,000 of them..(today 80,000,000) Of the organized Militia, or the national guard, 115,000.”

How much clearer could that be..Clearly all men between the ages of 18 and 45 are the unenrolled (unorganized) militia with an absolute right to keep and bear arms under the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, The revised militia act of 1902 (Dick Act) is further proof of what the Founding Fathers intended the law of the land to be, and lets not forget our Creator giving all men the natural right to defend their life and liberty from attack ..first and foremost..against evil tyranny of any kind. The number of unenrolled or unorganized militia would be a very large body of citizens today, approximately 85,000,000 minimum, and 275,000,000 guns at their disposal. And not one so-called gun control “law” can deny the millions of citizens—by law the unenrolled (unorganized militia)—the right to keep and bear arms.

Federal “law” abridging this right is 100 percent unconstitutional, and the same applies to State law, and laws passed by any other legislative body at whatever level. And the citizens all come under the right to keep and bear arms as the Dick Act makes perfectly clear. The Militia Act and the revised Militia Act—The Dick Act, make perfectly plain that they go together to the citizen/people, the right to keep and bear arms for their own protection. For example, most States have wording similar to Constitution of the State of Idaho; Article 1 Section 11 ; First sentence;

” RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. The PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms, which right shall NOT be abridged.” Last sentence ;

” Nor shall any law permit the confiscation of firearms, except those actually used in the commission of a felony.” Of course keep in mind police want to call most self defense actions a felony..If your house is surrounded by federal thugs acting in violation of the Constitution federal and state, and you fight to defend private property and life your committing a felony…according to the tyrants.. Never mind all the felonies they commit daily by violating the SUPREME LAW OF THIS NATION AND STATE our Constitutions..our Bill of Rights and Our Declaration of Independence…The City of Hailey Idaho recently proved trespassing dogs have more rights than a property owner does..shame on them..

In the foregoing is revealed how shallow, ill-informed and vacuous are the courts, city’s, and their police in upholding any type of “gun control” so-called “legislation.” In the first instance it is impertinence on the part of any local council, board, State legislature, and the Congress, to attempt to pass “laws” restricting the 2nd Amendment, as any such ” law” is not in consonance with, or pursuant to, or incidental to another power expressly implied, something already in the Constitution..

Chief Justice John Marshall said that unless the power sought complies with the foregoing constitutional requirements, it is a prohibition of such power (law, ordinance, code,etc..) Therefore ALL so-called “gun laws” are nullities, and not laws at all, and incumbent upon none to observe. No ordinance or law can be based on a violation of the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, and the Dick Act, and Article 1, Section 9, part 3 of the U.S. Constitution.

Neither local boards, State legislatures, the president, nor the Congress nor the Supreme Court nor the U.S. district courts, can exceed the delegated powers of the federal government, just because their doing it does not make it correct, their flat out in error and it is up to us the PEOPLE to correct this error..Nor can they add or subtract one comma from the delegated powers of the federal government given by the Constitution and Bill of Rights, which powers were granted by, We the PEOPLE. Any attempts to infringe on the right to bear arms vested in the people, is treason, sedition, appalling, malfeasance, sophistry and mendacity, and should be treated as such. Shame shame shame on you public servants for thumbing your nose to the very document which provides us all Liberty including yourselves..Shame on the fools, you walk freely into the cage for your masters and attempt to deliver us all into their bondage..shame on you..

To try and separate the right of We the People from the 2nd Amendment and say it is addressed solely to the states militia, or to attempt to imbed it into the civil privilege rights of the 14th Amendment is nothing but quackery, venal stupid absurdity, puerile, degrading, ingenious mendacity, and nefarious double -speak. What Heller did in D.C.s Supreme Court-The U.S. 9th Circuit in California and others have tried to do is separate the 2nd Amendment from the rest of the Constitution and this flat out cannot be done and better not be allowed to be done..

The Constitution is a document of perfect equipoise; trying to isolate the 2nd Amendment from the rest of the Constitution is an attack on the whole Constitution..The communists need to destroy the Constitution once and for all, they have been chipping away at it since prior to the Civil War, and the 1868 14th did white men no justice either. The 14th issue is large and needs addressed and I shall do so soon..

Justice Marshall further states that when a legislative body (including a city, town, or county council) goes outside the pale and the ken of the Constitution, its directives, ordinances, rules, regulations that purport to abridge the right of citizens to keep and bear arms, are null and void and no law at all, being mere hypotheses heaped upon hypotheses. Local governments cannot pass ordinances that violate the 2nd Amendment Rights belonging to We the People, that is our property our document not theirs, nor any other Amendment dealing with personal rights, and these rights are Biblical first and even date back to the Magna Carta..Get out of my gun cabinet you fools..!!!

No wonder Thomas Jefferson said, ” To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all Constitutional questions is a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

One of the worst cases showing violations against the 2nd Amendment was carried out by a judge in the notorious unconstitutional Morton Grove case, research it yourselves. The list is endless and this fight is ages old…Their is only one reason to create gun control, and gun registration, and to twist legal facts and that is to enslave us folks..the communist wants us unarmed while he holds a gun himself…their looting us brazenly and wish to disarm us, the thieves lust for all that is ours, and they know to take the rest of it our arms must be taken soon.. The Court flurries you see over this gun issue are solely to steal your guns..They have been trying this for over 170 years, in fact the reason the trigger was tripped for liberty 235 years ago was due to King George wishing to confiscate our weapons…That's right, attempted gun confiscation started this episode of FREEDOM..Are we going to let gun confiscation end it ? There working towards that goal…The Snakes in the grass need rooted out now…

Having researched my rights, Biblical, Constitutionally and other wise I realize the Mountain of evidence which supports those rights is insurmountable by the enemy other than to build their own mountain while attempting to breach my rights-our rights as free peaceful citizens, That mountain they build, those communists is a mountain of lies..frauds and deceptions, their pail is littered with holes and will not carry water…I could easily provide more blogs supporting our rights and the right to bear arms specifically, the law journals and other writings are numerous..I often am amazed at the lowest dredges of society being in charge of government..and how they twist it to fit their own needs while ignoring ours…

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Crux of our dilemma


This treatise describes a conspiracy more evil than any other the [U]nited States of America have seen in their many years of existence. The Fourteenth Amendment is a fully orchestrated conspiracy in its most uniquely veiled form, now over 135 years old. The conspiracy is in plain sight and understood by no one who is not one of the “enlightened” or of the Holy Spirit.

This discourse is birthed by Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Briefly, this section has to do with the public debt of the United States and slaves. Most readers in the “Freedom Movement” have probably read and heard stories and opinions on the Fourteenth Amendment. The dis/non-information on this amendment is so widespread and deeply ingrained that most people focus on Section 1; this section notwithstanding, the true evil lies in the other sections of the amendment that are truly unconscionable and wicked.
Because this treatise is entitled The Red Amendment, it contemplates a dual reference to the Fourteenth Amendment concerning the word RED. The two things are:

1. It was / is a vehicle for the implementation of Communism in America; 1 and,
2. It was / is a vehicle to deliberately bring the United States into perpetual debt.

The former is of design to achieve the latter. When these two factors are combined, it results in fundamental Involuntary Servitude.2 By the time you complete The Red Amendment, you will have no doubt in your mind that this is true. It is requested that you please keep an open mind, as Communism—or Marxism—is not what you think or you have been told it is.


Most Americans are aware that we had many problems with England during the birth of our unified nation.3 The two most notable problems were our War of Independence, and the War of 1812. Since we prevailed in these physical battles, covert measures taken by the money powers of Europe—i.e., the World Elite–also referred to herein as THEY—gained a veiled takeover of

1 The Cold War (Russians) was just an orchestrated phase (bogeyman) to implement communism in America; moreover, the world. Due to our Constitution, America was the biggest challenge of the world cabalists.

2 See book by Gerry Spence “Give me Liberty!” It goes over neo-slavery in fine detail. Recommended reading!

3 As a matter of international law, the American Union–or federation or confederation–is not really a nation.

The RED Amendment || 14th Amendment in Law Exposé Page 1 OF 187
the several united states of America. This stepped destruction of the freedom of Americans has been achieved through stealthy financial terrorism.4 There are several orchestrated particulars that were required to accomplish this destruction: they will be outlined in this treatise.

4 For more information on the New World Order, you should read the following: “Financial Terrorism” by John F. McManus; and “Global Tyranny… Step by Step” by William F. Jasper. Both Excellent! Available from: American Opinion Book Services; John Birch Society, PO Box 8040, Appleton, Wisconsin 54913 - Phone: 414/749-3783.
5 Paganism. Read “Empower the People” by Tony Brown. It goes over this in fine detail. Recommended!

6 The number (666) is meant “To have fullness of the works of man”. In other words: Ruled by man, not God.

7 See the book: The New World Order Exposed, by Victor Thorn-ISBN 0-9701950-2-8 (

8 Chapter 178 of USC Title 28 – Professional and Amateur Sports Protection. A special chapter in the Judiciary is dedicated to sports. What is this all about? Protect the cabal with distractions with Bread and Circuses.

Almost everyone has heard the expression “New World Order”. You must be aware that America is the New World, thus, it is ventured that the “Order” emits from America. This author assumes that most people have some knowledge of this subject, such that this treatise need not labor over the specifics of the “New World Order”; although it will be covered in minimal context, to prove the point of a covert takeover and its evil presence in America.5

1.1.1 Illuminati / Masonry

The takeover was/is done through secret societies (puppets), mainly the Masonic Orders. The upper echelons of these societies—the Illuminati—are the ones that are involved in the true conspiracy. The lower ranks of these Orders are just patsies: they are kept totally ignorant of fact and truth. Most believe they belong to a fine, charitable, social organization: some being Christian based. In truth however, the fact of the matter is the enlightened worship Lucifer.
Because these people are into homage and symbolism, the presence of these Orders is openly displayed. Look at the back of a one-dollar “Federal Reserve Note” to see two such symbols:

1. The pyramid with the eerie illuminated eye, and
2. The Great Seal of the “United States”.

Accordingly, Washington D.C. was laid out to be a giant clandestine Masonic playground, where many other symbolisms can be found. One of the most intriguing of these symbolisms is the Washington Monument. The Monument that you see is 555 feet tall. The sub-structure of the Monument is 20 percent of 555; or 111 feet. Add the two together and you get 666: the Mark of the Beast as mentioned in the Bible.6 Coincidental? Perhaps. . . but highly doubtful.

This positions America as being Neo-Babylon: The New World Order, i.e. THE ORDER.7

1.1.2 Patriotism Directed to Military

To create this Babylonian New World Order, a power presence is required to be created. It is commonly known that the “United States” holds world dominance in power. This power had to be achieved by some simple mass means. Americans have been conditioned to patriotically support the United States Military Machine by taking sides in sporting events.8 This conditioning is thereupon directed to patriotism, which creates a subliminal righteousness to aggress against other sovereignties / nations. Do any of you recall similar methods used by Hitler?

Below are the definitions of Patriot and Mercenary from American Heritage


PATRIOT: One who loves, supports, and defends one's country.
MERCENARY: 1. One who serves or works merely for monetary gain; a hireling. 2. A professional soldier hired for service in a foreign army.

The RED Amendment || 14th Amendment in Law Exposé Page 2 OF 187
9 e.g. “The Patriot” A movie that featured Mel Gibson as the patriot against the British in the Revolutionary War.

10 Essays outlining the Constitution drafted by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay.

11 Americans have been brainwashed that wars create a good economy. WHAT! It kills people and creates debt!

12 In legal presence: “The People” are the State that translates to corporations controlled by the governing body at large, which eliminates PRIVATE enterprise. Moreover, corporations are controlled by the State; and generally, large ones govern the ruling policy of government. A simple formula is as follows: Corporations = State = Elite.

13 Drafted in 1848 by Marx (Moses Mordecai Levi-a non-Christian Jew), financed by Engels – a European Elitist.

In sense: A patriot is one that does not hire for monetary gain.9 In contraposition: How many Americans join the Service as a career? Has not the United States engaged in police actions recently, and over the past several decades? Is defending one’s country aggressing against another country or nation by reason of freeing them? Moreover, Article I of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress has the power to raise and support Armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years. However, since the Civil War the United States sustains a standing army. Why? As you will see while you are reading this treatise the United States is a foreign entity (see mercenary). For now it is asked: Is this your government?

In light of these matters, it has been said “It takes money to make money.” In a parallel sense, to gain dominance for an American fascist state, the funding had to come from somewhere; that somewhere is from covert theft and slave labor which is procured by way of an instrumental tool: the Fourteenth Amendment. The amendment actually creates a Quiet War on Americans. The “Blueprint” used to create this dominance was—and is—entitled: COMMUNISM.


Alexander Hamilton stated the following in the Federalist Papers:10
“. . .wars and rebellions are. . . the two most mortal diseases of society.”
So, why are we continually involved in wars around the world? . . . Wars create tremendous debt! That is why! 11 This debt is contrived to enhance the wealth of the World Elite through loans, which are paid through a political doctrine designated as: Communism. This particular political doctrine formulates an economic slave force under the banner of “The State”.

Communism is defined by Ballentine’s Law Dictionary as follows:

1. COMMUNISM: In the pristine sense, is the ownership of the means of production by the community,12 each member of the community participating in production according to his ability and sharing in the products according to his need;
2. In common usage of the present day, suggestive of the theories of Marx and Lenin and the politics and authoritarian rule.

The above term has been expressed in many ways; some of them are:

Democracy, Socialism, Liberalism, Fascism, etc. “THEY” keep altering the language to keep everyone off course and confused. However, all such language is tied to a secret cabal, which purviews through the work composed, by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels commonly entitled the “Communist Manifesto”.13 The purpose of this Blueprint is to enslave and control nations with perpetual debt while creating personal debt through materialism. Although it is believed to have been of a specific purpose to destroy Americans, its principles have been—and are being—applied throughout the world.

1.2.1 Communist Manifesto

The purported purpose of the Communist Manifesto is to overthrow the Middle Class, which has been—and remains—a thorn in the side of the World Elite in achieving world domination. After evaluating the tripe contained in the Manifesto, any intelligent man of God should gather that its main purpose is to put everything in the hands of the World Elite and enslave mankind.

The corrupt dictum of the Manifesto includes some of the following:

The RED Amendment || 14th Amendment in Law Exposé Page 3 OF 187
14 To embellish on this, this author was at breakfast with a legal colleague one morning in which we had chance to talk to our waitress, who happened to be an immigrant from Europe. She told us she had taken extensive classes in upper education. She further stated: Our Constitution was praised in the classes she had taken overseas; however, the classes she has taken in America were pushing this Marxist tripe. This author thought to himself. . . What’s with this? Anyway, we were both dumbfounded with this statement of information.

• Destruction of Belief in God (Religion)
• Destruction of the Natural Family Unit
• Elimination of Countries and Nations
• Destruction and Erosion of Morality
• Elimination of Private Property
• Elimination of Eternal Truths
• Elimination of Inheritance
• Elimination of Freedoms
• The Control of Commerce
• State-Run Transportation
• Education by the State
• Central Bank System
• Everyone Working
• Labor Unions
• Income Tax
• Free Love
• Confiscation of Property. . . from resistors of this great plan

Do any of the above particulars have the stench of familiarity? Do you see the relevant parallels that have been accomplished in America as of the last century, particularly since 1933? It is asked: Do you pay Income Tax? Have you ridden on Amtrak? Do you believe that the “United States of America” is your country? Do you know about the central bank called the Federal Reserve? Does anyone you know pay inheritance tax? Do you not own property, but yet your child gets a public school education? And, were you taught the “Theory of Evolution” in school? Americans should strongly question why this rubbish is taught in public schools. Universities that profess Marxist tripe are classes such as Liberal Arts or Political Science. We should point out that the Elite generally run such Institutions and favor liberal minded people.14

1.2.2 Controlled: Schools / Women / Debt / Religion

It is quite interesting that the government is determined to control the public schools. Common sense dictates the question; “How can Neo-Slavery be implemented if people are not being lied to and/or their minds are not being controlled?” If you have noticed, women have been conditioned to be part of the general work force. How can “THEY” get a piece of them through Income Tax if they are home raising their children? Therefore, women must be working. To further the plot of this silent Neo-Slavery, get people hooked on materialism and overspending, which creates personal debt. Are you in debt? The media promotes free love and immorality; you then get the break-up of families. If you belong to a religious establishment in America, which undoubtedly has a “501c3 non profit status” from the Internal Revenue Service, chances are your beliefs are being covertly controlled through government laid “political speech”.

The greatest tool used by the Elite are the people of the labor force. These people have been sucked into the plot of the Elite. They are told they are battling an enemy dubbed: Capitalists. These people are just being used as tools that are of a subversive design to harass the middle class owned businesses. This hindrance will ultimately bankrupt these businesses. The Elite thus get the employees and other ensuing gains with this subversive cabal.

You must think outside of the “Marxist box” that has been built around you. Most people in America are working full time jobs, now middle-class husband and wife. People should not be burdened to the point where life is all work. Accordingly, this gives little time to spend with family and other pleasures of life. An immediate cause of this epidemic is over taxation, due to the system of Neo-Slavery conceived by the World Elite – COMMUNISM.

The RED Amendment || 14th Amendment in Law Exposé Page 4 OF 187

To set a relevant background for the premises—and to break through the Marxist lies that have been fed to you—some essential legal and historical information must be established.

The United States government was/is not to interact or do business with peoples of the several republics. The strict limitations of the government of the Union can be found in Article I, Section 8, of the original (organic) Constitution. Furthermore, you should fully understand the premises of the Ninth and Tenth Articles in Amendment in the organic Constitution; these amendments were to protect the peoples (the several States) of America from the Union government.

True Country and Nation of Americans

Interestingly enough, most Americans are unaware that their true country and nation is not the United States of America. One’s country and nation is one of the following:

1. Native state, which is a natural national domicile, or
2. Chosen state, which is considered an acquired national domicile.

Now—in actual evidence—the following pre-Civil War law definition supports this fact. Behold this uncommonly known legal truth as set forth by Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856:

COUNTRY: By country is meant the state of which one is a member. Every man’s country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born.15
Did you realize that your state is your true country and nation?16 Probably not. . . because you have been lied to. The truth is being subdued/hidden in Public Schools.17 Note that de jure state nationals, not United States citizens, are the sovereign power of their countries.

Pursuant to disinformation, the Constitution does not give the several states a Democracy. The Constitution guarantees a republic government. Such a government can be evidenced in Article IV, section 4, of the Constitution. Rome became a so-called Democracy, what you live in now. The Roman Empire collapsed due to its people over indulging in sporting events, dictatorships, corruption, military aggression, sexual perversions, etc. Does this sound familiar to you?

Local Control key to happiness

In 1762 Jean Jacques Rousseau wrote: “The Social Contract or Principles of Political Right,” In this particular writing he stated the following about the political rights of people:

“...the political rights of people would be best guarded if they were kept very local, not broad.”

The Republic political premise under the Constitution is based on the premise of local principles noted by Jean Jacques Rousseau. These principles are fundamentally noted as:

1. The several states of America—which are American republics and/or nations, i.e. the collective are so entitled the people—are separated from each other.
• All people of a particular state were citizens (nationals) of the particular state in which they lived (American national, e.g. Ohio national, Iowa national, etc).

( nation or people, or the inhabitants of such territory. In the primary meaning “country” denotes the population, the nation, the state, or the government, having possession and dominion over a territory. A bit vague, is it not.

16 No! The change of definition is not due to modernization. Further, it does get old hearing people say “Times have changed” or “The Constitution is old”. It is evident they have been programmed by Communist dicta.

17 See Communist Manifesto, Plank 10 – Public School Education. Marxism needs to control minds.

18 Legally, your state or country of birth is where your lawful (constitutional) allegiance is! See Title 8 USC § 1101(a)(21). The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state. For further information on state nationalities, based on the Law of Nations, see 1984 U.S. government Style Manual, chapter 5.22/5.23. )

19 See the discourse by Gerald Brown entitled “Cooperative Federalism”. E-mail:

20 Check into Land Patents. This is the full title under the original allodium principle.

21 Although this principal sounds worthy, it is against Biblical principles and is feudal. This serves as prima facie evidence that this system under the Constitution was going to transfer debt to people of the states.

The United States government is separate from peoples of the several republics.

Furthermore, to continue this political curriculum, Alexander Hamilton set forth this in Federalist Paper number 9 in reference to the proposed government of the federation; it was the premise of the United States’ non-interference in the affairs of the several American republics:

“As this government is composed of small republics, it enjoys the internal happiness of each.”

Following the Republic political reasoning found in the Federalist Papers, the founding fathers fully outlined what a Republic Form of Government was to consist of in the Papers.

Again, the Republican Form of Government is guaranteed to the states by the Union, i.e. via the federal government, in Article IV, Section 4, of the Constitution. Such form of government is clearly noted by the following statement by James Madison in Federalist Paper 10:

“The two great points of difference between a Democracy and a Republic are:
1. First, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest;

2. Secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended.”

In other words: The several republics make up the federal government; many local controlled governments extending outward from the counties of each republic; not inward as it is now. Currently, money is taken from each republic, then is distributed amongst the several States as the federal government sees fit. The federal government uses such power as leverage against the States to dictate “ITS” policies to them. These measures destroy the fundamental purpose of the Ninth and Tenth Articles in Amendment, which protected the states.
Moreover, a nation which does not contribute as much as another takes from one that is more productive, thus destroying the internal happiness of each republic as originally outlined by the founding fathers. The non-productive have no incentive to become more productive, and the productive have less incentive to remain productive to benefit its society.19

1.3.3 Land Ownership and Suffrage

To guarantee political control to peoples of America, state suffrage had originally come from the ownership of land.20 Each republic established its own dictates in regard. These premises were established in Federalist Paper 35 by Alexander Hamilton. See the logic behind his premise:

“Nothing remains but the landed interest; and this, in a political view, and particularly in relation to taxes, I take to be perfectly united, from the wealthiest landlord down to the poorest tenant. No tax can be laid on land that will not affect the proprietor of millions of acres as well as the proprietor of a single acre. Every landholder will therefore have a common interest to keep the taxes on land as low as possible; and common interest may always be reckoned upon as the surest bond of sympathy.” . . .21

Hamilton further stated in Federalist Paper 35:

“It is said to be necessary, that all classes of citizens should have some of their own number in the representative body, in order that their feelings and interests may be the better understood and attended to. . . Will not the landholder know and feel whatever will promote or insure the interest of landed property? And will he not, from his own interest in that species of property, be sufficiently prone to resist every attempt to prejudice or encumber it?. . . There is no part of the administration of government that requires extensive information and a thorough knowledge of the principles of political economy, so much as the business of taxation. The man who understands those principles best will be least likely to resort to oppressive expedients, or sacrifice any particular class of citizens to the procurement of revenue.”

Socialism Promotes Irresponsibility

The current bastardized government—instituted just after the so-called Civil War—is based on Socialism and/or Communism. Maybe you have heard the Marxist expression: “Pay Your Fair Share”. A common sense consensus of paying your fair share is not that of taking from “haves” and “contributors” and giving it to “have nots” and “non-contributors”, hence, raising taxes for welfare to maintain shiftless people who care not to truly contribute to the peoples of a specific American republic. This tacit political formula is simply a plot to destroy—or bring down—people of the middle class, hence creating a nation of serfs, i.e. servitude. Accordingly, these measures transfer all land and wealth to the control of the World Elite for their benefit.22

These matters are in parallel to what Thomas Jefferson once said:

“If we can prevent the government from wasting the labours of the people under the pretense of caring for them, they will be happy.”

Americans are being subversively and intentionally over taxed. It can be stated with conviction that not too many Americans are happy about what has transpired. This secretly imposed adult baby-sitting service has cost Americans their freedom, and accordingly their true sovereignty.23 Without question such losses are primarily caused by the Fourteenth Amendment.

22 Jean Jacques Rousseau stated in: The Social Contract or Principles of Political Right: "Under bad governments, this equality is only apparent and illusory: it serves only to keep the pauper in his poverty and the rich man in the position he has usurped. In fact, laws are always of use to those who possess and harmful to those who have nothing: from which it follows that the social state is advantageous to men only when all have something and none too much." In other words, what Mr. Rousseau was saying is: Socialism (that is—a Socialist State) is of purpose to steal from “the people” to benefit the Elite under guise of the State. In parallel sense-Roman Senator Publius Cornelius Tacitus (50c-115c AD) stated: "The more corrupt the State, the more numerous the laws."

23 Whiners, such as Warren Beatty, who want back their adult baby-sitting government (socialism/FDR era) do not have a clue. What is now in place was the ultimate plan. Russia, China and Cuba were/are just bogeymen, and socialism was just a phase to get everyone suckered into Corporate Servitude (American Communism). Hence, some advice to socialists: Such people should research the legacy of FDR; they would find out you do not get something for nothing; we are still paying for FDR’s handouts! See “Bretton Woods Agreements Act”.


This author has personally read several cases on the Fourteenth Amendment ranging from the Dred Scott to the Slaughterhouse cases. As both stated cases are quite extensive, this author is convinced that all such case law was orchestrated drivel to substantiate the necessity for the existence—and the passage of—the Fourteenth Amendment, which is fallout from the Civil War. The so-called Civil War is commonly said to be over the issue of slavery. This author concurs; however, as you will see herein the slaves were transferred over to the control of the United States. You may believe that reference is being made to people of African descent owned by Southern plantation owners; as those persons’ Civil Rights were to be guarded by the United States legislation. On the contrary! . . . Reference is actually being made to all Americans being tacitly enslaved by the purported government of the Union: the “United States”.

The RED Amendment || 14th Amendment in Law Exposé Page 7 OF 187

24 Slavery is/was a tool used to sell the purpose of the Civil War. You must realize that slavery was a common law (custom) of England which was brought to America. If fingers should point to anyone, let it be them.

25 Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition Deluxe.

26 See definition of “in fact.” Also see definition of “government de facto.” The use of ‘in fact’ in the definition of “de facto” is misleading. It should say “of fact” as parenthesized above. Intentional?. . . you be the judge.

27 The de facto “United States” became a sovereign power. In reference thereof, a passage out of Tony Brown’s Book “Empower the People”, although Mr. Brown did not go into legal detail (as we have), made reference to secret societies being pleased about the re-colonization of the republics after the Civil War, which stands to reason, as these political subdivisions are referred to as: Colonies, under the color of law (14th Amendment).

28 NATURALIZATION CLAUSE. The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Section 1, provides that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States, and of the State wherein they reside. Black’s Law. See also Title 8 USC § 1101(a)(22). Definitions. The

1.4.1 Hegelian Dialectic

In reality, the slavery issue was just a mechanism used to implement the Civil War;24 this was accomplished by using a thing called the Hegelian Dialectic. This technique is named after the German philosopher, Hegel. A perpetrator uses the Hegelian process to bring about a desired result by using mob psychology. The process is in three parts and is illustrated as follows:

1. Thesis: A problem is intentionally created: The immorality of slavery.
2. Antithesis: Opposition to the problem is created: The Civil War.
3. Synthesis: The desired result is the “solution”: The Fourteenth Amendment,
i.e. the “Reconstruction Amendments”, the 13th,14th,15th.

The Great Depression of the 1930’s was an incident orchestrated according to the Hegelian Dialectic. But note that the Hegelian Dialectic is not just confined to America. The anti-terrorist legislation of Adolf Hitler in 1930’s Germany is a perfect example. Hitler wanted the capability to detain people without question and hold them in custody without a court hearing. The people of Germany desired no such thing; so Hitler’s minions burned the Reichstag building to the ground. He blamed terrorists for the incident. The media portrayed the event to be a danger to society and the well being of the German people. They demanded that something be done, so Hitler introduced his anti-terrorist legislation with the enthusiastic consent of the people. Does such incident sound familiar to you? That is to say, have any comparable incidents—like the Reichtag incident—happened recently in America that brought about any terrorist legislation?

1.4.2 De Facto and De Jure

Now that it has been established how a planned societal change is brought about, we can better address the issue of the unlawful governments that are now present in the republics. First, you must understand the precise difference between de facto and de jure. Simply put: de facto is not according to law; and, de jure is according to law. The legal definitions 25 are as follows:

DE FACTO: In fact (of fact),26 as distinguished from “de jure,” by right.

DE JURE: By right; by lawful right; rightfully; complying with the law in all respects; valid in law. (i.e. constitutional; in conformity with the law of nations)
To apply the above definitions of de facto and de jure, you must first be aware that after the Civil War (so-called) the federal government gained dominion (it conquered and controlled) over all states in guise of the Union. A governmental system de facto was then created by the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment. The amendment stealthily and politically fabricates all several States in the Union to be quasi-political subdivisions of the “United States”.27

The crucial factor is that the Fourteenth Amendment naturalizes all Americans to be citizens and nationals of the United States at birth.28 Under the stealthy operations of law, the Fourteenth Amendment—in essence—negates all state nationalities de jure.

The RED Amendment || 14th Amendment in Law Exposé Page 8 OF 187
term “” means: (A) A , or (B) A person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [ Latter, (B), relates that a citizen of the United States owes permanent allegiance to the United States too. Does not mean a person as defined by 1101(a)(21). See Title 8 USC § 1408 for a person as described in (B) ] National of the U.S. = Communist. national of the United Statescitizen of the United States

29 “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. The fact that citizens, at a given time may prefer specie to currency, or vice versa, cannot prevent Congress from enacting those laws which it deems necessary to the maintenance of a proper monetary system.” From: Contracts Payable in Gold. Senate Resolution No. 62 (April 24, 1933)

30 See “Fee Simple” and “Property Tax.” Constitutional land ownership is under freehold, thus not taxable.

31 IN FACT. Actual, real; as distinguished from implied or inferred. Resulting from the acts of parties, instead of from the act or intendment of law (i.e. the de jure Constitution). Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition Deluxe

32 BELLIGERENTS. A body of insurgents who by reason of their temporary organized government are regarded as conducting lawful hostilities. Ballentine’s Law Dictionary. See state governments defined in Title 18 USC § 11.

33 From the case Thorington v Smith, 75 US 1 (1868), the definition found in Black’s Law Dictionary, now removed.

34 Government “of fact” not “in fact” Definition source: Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition Deluxe

The following is what transpired with the implementation of the Fourteenth Amendment:

1. It usurps the political sovereignty of all the republics, which translates into:
2. The nations or countries of America, as secured by the original constitutional premises, are ultimately destroyed,
• It has stolen the political allegiance of people and assigns it to a de facto federal government (the United States), and installs them by stealth into a political Democracy, verses a Republic government in fact; and,
3. It puts the land of people in quasi-joint tenancy with the government (feudalism).29

SIMPLY PUT: This is all dicta which is established by the Communist Manifesto. The Manifesto mandates the elimination of nationalities, countries and ownership of property.30

De facto government[s] will be further discussed later herein; but for now take notice that:

1. The federal and state governments are not your “constitutional” governments.
2. As a matter of law they are not governments “IN FACT”; 31
3. They are, as a matter of law INSURGENT.32 In other words: An Insurgent Democracy.

Actually, they are military style governments, which will be described in more detail later.

1.4.3 Insurgent Governments

As defined by the United States Supreme Court,33 the legal description that is attached to the insurgents’ governmental system under the Fourteenth Amendment is as follows:

GOVERNMENT DE FACTO: A government of fact.34

1. A government actually exercising power and control, as opposed to the true and lawful government; a government not established according to the constitution of the nation, or not lawfully entitled to recognition or supremacy, but which has nevertheless supplanted or displaced the government de jure.

2. A government deemed unlawful, or deemed wrongful or unjust, which, nevertheless, receives presently habitual obedience from the bulk of the community.

3. There are several degrees of what is called “de facto government”. Such a government, in its highest degree, assumes a character very closely resembling that of a lawful government.

The RED Amendment || 14th Amendment in Law Exposé Page 9 OF 187

• This is when the usurping government expels the regular authorities from their customary seats and functions, and establishes itself in their place, and so becomes the actual government of a country.

• The distinguishing characteristic of such a government is that adherents to it in war against the government de jure do not incur the penalties of treason; and, under certain limitations, obligations assumed by it in behalf of the country or otherwise will, in general, be respected by the government de jure when restored.
4. Such a government might be more aptly denominated a “government of paramount force,” being maintained by active military power against the rightful authority of an established and lawful government; and obeyed in civil matters by private citizens.

5. They are usually administered directly by military authority, but they may be administered, also, by civil authority, supported more or less by military force.

The above is not just a general definition. In its dictum, the court silently described the current insurgent governmental system. It is recommended that you study the content of its dissertation and compare it with what will be put forth in explanatory fact in this treatise. Legal evidence will be set forth later on that supports that the Fourteenth Amendment actually creates Quiet Wars within the several republics of America; this having people act in treason to their countries.
To understand the truth about the constitutional government, you should again reference the section on the CONSTITUTIONAL UNION. For your integral understanding, it is advised you read the Federalist Papers; that will provide you additional understanding of the constitutional governmental system. Our de jure system is not a so-called Democracy; such imputes a system of insurgents placed unwittingly by peoples of the American republics in the Union.